Good morning. We're covering the new clarity about college admissions — as well as Michigan, Gaza and nepo models.
Diversity before the courtAfter the Supreme Court banned race-based affirmative action last year, many people in higher education worried that it would be only the first in a series of decisions that reduced diversity at selective schools. In particular, university administrators and professors thought the court might soon ban admissions policies that gave applicants credit for overcoming poverty. Such class-based policies disproportionately help Black, Hispanic and Native students. For now, though, these worries appear to be misplaced. And the future of admissions at selective colleges and high schools has suddenly become clearer. In today's newsletter, I'll explain. The Texas modelThe situation has become clearer because the Supreme Court last week declined to hear a lawsuit against a public magnet school in Northern Virginia — Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, known as T.J. Until recently, T.J. admitted students based on a mix of grades, test scores, student essays and teacher recommendations. This process led to a student body that looked very different from the area it served. About 5 percent of T.J. students were Black or Hispanic, even though the surrounding area is about 37 percent Black or Hispanic. The school also enrolled few low-income students of every race, as Richard Kahlenberg of Georgetown University has noted. Only 2 percent of Asian students at T.J. came from low-income families, compared with 20 percent of Asian students in the surrounding area. In 2021, though, T.J. switched to a new admissions policy. It was modeled after a bipartisan plan that Texas created in 1997, under Gov. George W. Bush. In T.J.'s version, the school filled most of its freshman class by accepting the top 1.5 percent of students at every public middle school in the area. The underlying idea is simple enough. Many communities in the U.S. are economically and racially homogenous. But a policy that accepts the top students from every community can create diverse classes. The policy is defensible on meritocratic grounds because it rewards teenagers who excel in every environment — and on political grounds because it gives all communities access to desirable schools. Once T.J. changed its policy, the school became much more diverse. The share of students from low-income families rose to 25 percent from 2 percent. Racial diversity also increased:
"I love T.J.," Kaiwan Bilal, one of the students accepted under the new policy, told The Washington Post. "It's even better than I expected, better than my parents told me it would be." Bilal also said that he was struck by the school's diversity. The SAT connectionNot everyone favors these changes, of course, and a group of parents and conservative legal activists sued to stop them. Their argument revolved around intent: They said that because T.J. had adopted the new policy with the goal of increasing racial diversity, it was illegal, even though it did not use racial preferences. In higher education, many people viewed the lawsuit with alarm. If the Supreme Court ruled against T.J., almost all class-based programs would have been at risk. Racial diversity would most likely plummet, especially in the wake of the ban on race-based policies. But the court didn't rule against T.J. Instead, it effectively endorsed class-based programs by refusing even to hear the T.J. case. Only two justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, dissented. The news has a connection to another story in higher education: the return of the standardized test requirement at some colleges. Last week, Yale announced that it would again require test scores from applicants, joining Dartmouth, M.I.T., Georgetown and Purdue, among others. At selective colleges like these, standardized test scores predict academic performance better than high school grades, research shows. A crucial part of the test requirement, however, is that colleges give applicants credit for overcoming disadvantage. The colleges don't expect top students from struggling high schools to do as well on the SAT as private school students. Lower-income students, after all, have been running with the wind in their faces. "We know society is unequal," Sian Beilock, Dartmouth's president, told me. "We're looking for the kids who are excelling in their environment." Last week's announcement by the Supreme Court means that schools (including those that don't require test scores) can feel comfortable taking economic disadvantage into account. Matching public opinionThere is also a broader significance. In these politically polarized times, I know that many liberals distrust the motivations of conservatives (and vice versa). After the Supreme Court — which is dominated by conservative justices — banned racial preferences, some liberals assumed that it might start a yearslong campaign against diversity. For now, though, cynicism seems unjustified, at least on this issue. Most justices are neither universally in favor of nor universally opposed to diversity programs. Context matters. As it happens, the court has also chosen a position that matches public opinion: Most Americans support class-based admissions policies and (as my colleague German Lopez has explained) oppose race-based policies. T.J.'s new policy, as Kahlenberg wrote in the journal National Affairs, is "doing what America has been pining after for a quarter-century: pursuing racial and economic diversity without the use of racial preferences."
Michigan Primary
More on Politics
Israel-Hamas War
War in Ukraine
More International News
Health
Other Big Stories
Opinions New York City is scary for birds like Flaco the owl. But so is freedom, Carl Safina writes. We publish new editions of old books to appreciate their place in history, Apoorva Tadepalli writes. Here are columns by Bret Stephens on why Nikki Haley is right to stay in the race and Thomas Edsall on falling birth rates and future voters. Discover more of the insight you value in The Morning. The Times is filled with information and inspiration every day. So gain unlimited access to everything we offer — and save with this introductory offer.
Not-so-golden ticket: A company promised families an immersive Willy Wonka experience. They got an empty warehouse and a few jelly beans. Today's Great Read: What makes your favorite TV characters tick? Look to their mothers. Recycling: Personal medical devices like inhalers, EpiPens and Covid-19 tests can easily accumulate. See if they can be recycled. Fashion pioneer: Meet a man who built a business selling undergarments to male cross-dressers and transgender women in the 1970s, when doing so was more taboo. Lives Lived: Bruce Newman oversaw Newel Galleries, a go-to destination in Manhattan for antique hunters with deep pockets. His customers included Jackie Kennedy and Barbra Streisand. He died at 94.
N.B.A.: Max Strus hit a 59-foot buzzer beater to give Cleveland an important win over Dallas. Men's college basketball: The unranked B.Y.U. upset No. 7 Kansas on the road. It was the Jayhawks' first home loss of the season. Soccer: The U.S. men's team will play a friendly against Brazil.
Nepo models: Scarlet Stallone, a daughter of Sylvester, walked her first runway for Tommy Hilfiger. Eve Jobs, a daughter of Steve, has modeled for Louis Vuitton and Michael Kors. Lila Moss, the daughter of Kate, is a Victoria's Secret recruit. The casting of celebrities' children — long common for Hollywood — seems to be catching on in fashion, Elizabeth Paton writes, as luxury brands find that big names can increase online engagement. More on culture
Add liquid to this pasta gradually, the way you would for risotto. Create a room so cozy, it feels like a hug. Subscribe to a wine club. Move your home office outside.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was unzipped. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku and Connections. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wednesday, February 28, 2024
The Morning: The SAT and the Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment